🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive action to prohibit social media access for those under 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Politicians, child protection groups, and parents are observing with great interest to see if this tactic will become a template for countries abroad.

Across Europe Trend

In Europe, a increasing chorus of nations are considering similar restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for under-15s, with the leader arguing that mobile devices and networks are "taking away our youngsters' childhood". Legislation could be passed next year.
• The Norwegian government is set to implement a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to protect young people from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to verify the age and identity of social media users. Officials have stated that an Australia-style ban could be "a potential measures in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the president has asked lawmakers to pass a proposal lifting the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has suggested a comparable move, including an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The administration in the Netherlands has urged parents to block their youngsters from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has passed a non-binding resolution calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 unless parental consent is granted. While it warns of the "habit-forming" design of these services, the resolution does not enact binding law.

"A clear age barrier is a good first step," stated one European lawmaker supporting the initiative.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Eye

In the UK, the leadership has kept open a potential ban, stating that "no measure is being dismissed" but insisting any decision must be "supported by conclusive research".

Last year, interest built behind a proposal to introduce limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually modified. However, the administration vowed to investigate the issue.

Charities have expressed concerns. One foundation established by the relatives of a girl who was lost after being exposed to dangerous online content contends that a strict age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of harm when teens become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the refusal of the tech sector to build products and services that are appropriate and suitable for minors," commented a influential child protection advocate.

The United States: A Fragmented Landscape

Across America, regulation is mostly happening at the state level against a backdrop of country-wide stalemate.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a measure banning children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a law restricting under-16s to one hour of social media time per day, with any further time needing a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise introduced bills mandating guardian approval for under-16s to create social media profiles.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from some politicians to follow this path, a US-wide ban is presently seen as improbable.

International Outlook

Outside of Europe and the US, other countries are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, world organizations strike a more measured stance. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "might prove counterproductive". The organization highlights that social networks can be a "vital connection" for isolated children and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to improve safety.

While this worldwide conversation continues, the policies of this nation and others demonstrate that states globally are less and less willing to stand by for platforms to make changes on their own.