Families' Anguish Regarding Coastal Degradation Endangering Norfolk Burial Sites
Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.
An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards
The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.
A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.
“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”
Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.
Haunted by the Past
A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.
“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”
“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”
A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy
Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.
“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”
In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”
Searching for Answers and Certainty
The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.
Several families want additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.
“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”
A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”
He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”
“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the right solutions for each community.”
The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.